Delhi High Court held that the requirement of issuing notice in the name of a right person and not to a dead person is not ...

Conclusion- It is settled law that cancellation of GST registration does not affect the taxpayer’s liability under relevant ...

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that wood roughly squared and half squared and not further manufactured is classifiable under tariff ...

Conclusion: Fees collected by the agricultural market committee for its services were not tax and was generally defined to be ...

Conclusion: Addition under section 68 on account of large cash deposit made during the 2016 demonetization period was not ...

Conclusion: AO passed TDS order issued for non–deduction of TDS and interest thereon u/s 201 (1) and 201 (1A) was beyond the ...

Delhi High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as ...

In the case of Hariyana Ship Demolition Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Custom-Jamnagar (PREV), the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that ...

In the case of Anand Swaroop Rastogi Vs State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court addressed the validity of GST demand orders ...

Madras High Court held that benefit of section 10B of the Income Tax Act available even before setting off of unabsorbed ...

In support of his argument, he relied upon the judgement of this Court in Writ Tax no. 1417 of 2022 decided on 5.4.2024 ...

In the case of Essel Kitchenware Limited & Anr. vs. Joint Commissioner of State Tax, the Calcutta High Court addressed a ...